hth官方网页版中国有限公司hth官方网页版中国有限公司

0571-87968248 CHINESE
  • Home
  • About us
    ProfileCultureHistory
  • News
    Company newsTrade showsIndustry news
  • Products
    COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test KitAllergen-specific IgE antibodies test kit seriesFood-specific IgG/IgG4 antibodies test seriesSingle/Polynomial allergen test seriesSingle allergen component test seriesGenetic test for allergic diseases series productsOther seriesProduct specific equipment
  • About allergies
    Scientific literaturePopular scienceVideos
  • Contact us
    Join usContact us
Scientific literaturePopular scienceVideos
Components literatureGene literatureMechanism literatureProbioticsTest literatureDesensitizationOther

浙大迪迅

Release date:2018-11-13


World Allergy Organization journal
[IF:6.8]
Allergy diagnosis from symptoms to molecules, or from molecules to symptoms: a comparative clinical study
DOI: doi.org/10.1186/s40413-018-0199-y
Abstract:
Abstract
Background
Classical allergy diagnostic workup “from symptoms to molecules” comprises 1) clinical investigation, 2) skin prick- and IgE- testing, and recently, 3) molecular allergy testing. We aimed to examine the diagnostic fidelity of the alternative approach “from molecules to symptoms”, which was recently suggested in the EAACI Molecular Allergology User’s Guide, in a retrospective clinical study.
Methods
Records from 202 patients with clinically suspected allergic sensitizations were extracted from files at two sites applying either the “ISAC-first” workup with IgE-testing by immuno-solid phase allergen chip ISAC112 followed by selected skin prick tests (SPT) or the “SPT-first” starting with SPT followed by the microarray test.
Results
In the ISAC-first procedure significantly less SPTs were performed during allergy diagnosis (median 4 vs. 14). By SPT in 19% of patients in the ISAC-first group and in 34% in the SPT-first group additional respiratory allergens (p = 0.014) were detected not positive in ISAC microarray. By ISAC microarray test 18% additional sensitizations were found in the ISAC-first, and 32% in SPT-first cohort (p = 0.016). For food allergens 13 and 12% additional sensitizations were detected by the microarray not detected by SPT in the two groups (p = 0.800). No additional food allergen was found by SPT in the ISAC-first group, while in 6% of the cases in the SPT-first group detected sensitizations were negative in the microarray.
Discussion
The ISAC-first approach followed by (fewer) SPTs meets the demands for a patient’s tailored diagnostic work-up and therefore can be considered equivalent to the conventional way using the skin prick test as first screening tool, followed by IgE diagnosis.
Conclusions
For the diagnostic verification of clinically suspected allergy, the novel concept “from molecules to clinic” offers a reliable diagnostic workup in shorter time. Due to lower skin test numbers it is especially applicable for young children and seniors, in atopic patients, and whenever skin tests get difficult or unreliable.
First Author:
N. Mothes-Luksch
Correspondence:
Jensen-Jarolim
All Authors:
N. Mothes-Luksch G. Jordakieva, L. Hinterhölzl , A. N. Jensen  P. K. Hallmann,  M. KundianE. Jensen-Jarolim
2018-10-24  Review
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Products
  • About allergies
  • Contact us
Hangzhou Zheda Dixun Biological Gene Engineering Co., Ltd.  Copyright    HZKC Technical support   浙ICP备14005341号   (浙)-非经营性-2019-0050
Address: Rm.201-209, Bldg.2, No.568 Binkang Rd., Binjiang Dist.      Tel: 0571-87968248-805     Website:www.szzyfzls.com

COPYRIGHT©2003-2024 www.szzyfzls.com CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Official WeChat

乐动网页版 | 江南游戏 | 开云在线登录 | 江南游戏 | 开云电子(中国)有限公司官网 | 乐竞网页版登录入口 | 九州平台 | 冠盈体育(中国)科技有限公司官网 | 乐动手机网页版登录入口 |